Skip to main content
TeX - LaTeX

Return to Question

edited title
Link
Zarko
Zarko
  • 317.6k
  • 25
  • 190
  • 399

Combination of \dot, \tlde\tilde and \widetilde: a predefinite alternative symbol

added 48 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Sebastiano
Sebastiano
  • 66.9k
  • 18
  • 123
  • 267

Combination of \dot, \tlde and \widetilde: a predefinite alternative symbolssymbol

Starting from this MWE,

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} \begin{document} \[\tilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \tilde{u}\] \[\widetilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \widetilde{u}\] \end{document}

that produces this image:

enter image description here

reading this question, mathabx and mathtools: \widetilde{} and \dot{} problem, I was trying to understand if exists a symbol like \tilde, or \widetilde (without macro) that has more coverage than the u or another letter.

In fact, with the symbol \dot, you can see that \tilde is small and it has little coverage with the letter u. While if I use\widetilde it looks higher, than the dot, but too big in lenght.

Combination of \dot, \tlde and \widetilde: a predefinite alternative symbols

Starting from this MWE

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} \begin{document} \[\tilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \tilde{u}\] \[\widetilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \widetilde{u}\] \end{document}

that produces this image:

enter image description here

reading this question, mathabx and mathtools: \widetilde{} and \dot{} problem, I was trying to understand if exists a symbol like \tilde, or \widetilde (without macro) that has more coverage than the u or another letter.

In fact, with the symbol \dot, you can see that \tilde is small. While if I use\widetilde it looks higher, than the dot, but too big in lenght.

Combination of \dot, \tlde and \widetilde: a predefinite alternative symbol

Starting from this MWE,

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} \begin{document} \[\tilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \tilde{u}\] \[\widetilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \widetilde{u}\] \end{document}

that produces this image:

enter image description here

reading this question, mathabx and mathtools: \widetilde{} and \dot{} problem, I was trying to understand if exists a symbol like \tilde, or \widetilde (without macro) that has more coverage than the u or another letter.

In fact, with the symbol \dot, you can see that \tilde is small and it has little coverage with the letter u. While if I use\widetilde it looks higher, than the dot, but too big in lenght.

Source Link
Sebastiano
Sebastiano
  • 66.9k
  • 18
  • 123
  • 267

Combination of \dot, \tlde and \widetilde: a predefinite alternative symbols

Starting from this MWE

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb} \usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath} \begin{document} \[\tilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \tilde{u}\] \[\widetilde{\dot{u}}=-i \omega \widetilde{u}\] \end{document}

that produces this image:

enter image description here

reading this question, mathabx and mathtools: \widetilde{} and \dot{} problem, I was trying to understand if exists a symbol like \tilde, or \widetilde (without macro) that has more coverage than the u or another letter.

In fact, with the symbol \dot, you can see that \tilde is small. While if I use\widetilde it looks higher, than the dot, but too big in lenght.