Timeline for Illegal unit, and missing number when trying to define variables
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 20, 2023 at 17:06 | vote | accept | Addem | ||
| May 20, 2023 at 16:04 | answer | added | Qrrbrbirlbel | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 19, 2023 at 23:24 | vote | accept | Addem | ||
| S May 20, 2023 at 17:06 | |||||
| May 19, 2023 at 22:47 | answer | added | egreg | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 19, 2023 at 19:24 | comment | added | Addem | @Qrrbrbirlbel setting parse=true is my favorite solution! Thank you -- if you want to turn it into an answer, I'll accept it. | |
| May 19, 2023 at 19:22 | comment | added | Qrrbrbirlbel | You either have to evaluate (\n-1)*\step in its own macro und use that macro in its place or use parse=true as an option to \foreach which instructs it to evaluate the last element in the list for you. That said, maybe some kind of plot, say the jump mark mid, would be more appropriate for it. | |
| May 19, 2023 at 19:16 | history | asked | Addem | CC BY-SA 4.0 |