Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalIt's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or between the backticks ((``)`…`) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are also differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or between the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are also differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or between the backticks (`…`) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are also differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or beweenbetween the backticks (``)(``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike the backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are asoalso differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or beween the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike the backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are aso differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or between the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are also differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or beween the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike the backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are aso differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form because the backticks form is deprecated.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or beween the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike the backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are aso differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form because the backticks form is deprecated.
It's very similar to the backticks ``.
It's called command substitution (posix specification) and it invokes a subshell. The command in the braces of $() or beween the backticks (``) is executed in a subshell and the output is then placed in the original command.
Unlike the backticks, the $(...) form can be nested. So you can use command substitution inside another substitution.
There are aso differences in escaping characters within the substitution. I prefer the $(...) form.
