Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • If you'll give me some time, I'll give you a nice answer. I'm just a slow typer. It may be 30 minutes or more. Commented Sep 19, 2014 at 19:23
  • The main point of all these groups is for set-group-id programs. Commented Sep 19, 2014 at 19:23
  • 2
    The first question is very close to this one. Commented Sep 19, 2014 at 19:25
  • @ECarterYoung : Of course your can take your time, thanks for this ! Commented Sep 19, 2014 at 19:29
  • @Leiaz : I realized that but still wanted to ask the "Would it be bad to have a group "users" or "regulars" or whatever you want to call it that is the default group for every user instead of having their own ?" part, and kept what was before as an introduction. I primarly posted on StackOverflow but was directed here. Commented Sep 19, 2014 at 19:30