Timeline for Is there any reason to have a shebang pointing at /bin/sh rather than /bin/bash?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:11 | history | rollback | user79743 | Rollback to Revision 4 | |
| Dec 23, 2015 at 22:54 | history | edited | user79743 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Greatly expanded. |
| Dec 23, 2015 at 11:31 | comment | added | Jan Hudec | @RuiFRibeiro, nothing is statically linked in Debian. Dash is more limited, but it is limited mainly in interactive features (no completion and such) so that it is faster for scripts. | |
| Dec 23, 2015 at 4:37 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 3 characters in body |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 18:30 | comment | added | Charles Duffy | @RobertL, many of the facilities added in ksh and adopted by bash exist because they substantially ease the process of writing robust and correct scripts. Without the various additions allowing indirect assignment and evaluation to be performed safely, for instance, one can find oneself using eval, with attendant security exposure; similarly, without built-in regex support, one can need to use external commands (at a heavy performance penalty) for matching even within a single line, etc. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 16:33 | history | edited | user79743 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Some rewording. |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 16:24 | comment | added | user79743 | A more limited set of available tools of a simpler shell makes writing code for it more difficult (please avoid any fanatic war on this). That is why some users like zsh, which has even more tools available than bash. I like Bash more as is a balance between both extremes. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 16:18 | history | edited | user79743 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 5 characters in body |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 15:19 | history | answered | user79743 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |