Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 21, 2016 at 19:30 vote accept Jacob Ritchie
Apr 9, 2016 at 2:10 comment added cas @Gilles that's pretty much what i thought.
Apr 9, 2016 at 2:04 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' @cas file-rename is the Unicode::Tussle version. I think the reason rename.ul isn't an alternative for rename is because it's incompatible; but an administrator who favors consistency between distributions can still manually change the link to point to /usr/bin/rename.ul. I don't know if this would break any Debian scripts; in principle, according to policy, packages can count on the perl version if they depend on perl, and build scripts can count on the perl version since the perl package is build-essential.
Apr 9, 2016 at 2:01 history edited Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' CC BY-SA 3.0
added 175 characters in body
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:53 comment added cas hmmm, that's odd. on my sid system, util-linux doesn't provide an alternative for /usr/bin/rename. but another package rename does, so the choices are /usr/bin/prename from perl (priority 60) or /usr/bin/file-rename from rename (priority 70). file-rename seems to be an updated/enhanced version of prename.
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:46 comment added cas @FaheemMitha That's because /usr/bin/rename is controlled by debian's alternatives system. try update-alternatives --display rename. debian allows the local sysadmin to choose between util-linux or perl rename (or others, if any exist)
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:45 comment added Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' @FaheemMitha It's a symlink to /etc/alternatives/rename, which defaults to the Perl version (but can point to the util-linux version instead, at the choice of the administrator).
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:40 comment added Faheem Mitha /usr/bin/rename is not part of any package. At least dpkg -S /usr/bin/rename does not return anything.
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:33 history answered Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' CC BY-SA 3.0