Timeline for Is it possible to create a "negative" ACL?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2016 at 7:39 | vote | accept | dr_ | ||
| May 12, 2016 at 7:36 | comment | added | dr_ | You're absolutely right -- I just tested on a CentOS 7 machine and it works. @adonis, I'm going to accept Christopher's answer as the most correct one, but please write your comment as an answer so I can upvote. Thank you. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 21:47 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @dr01 No, other permissions do not apply if a more specific permission applies. User permissions are considered first, then group, then other. The first match applies, there is no “or” operation except within the group level. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 21:47 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Near-duplicate: Precedence of user and group owner in file permissions | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:52 | answer | added | Christopher | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:20 | comment | added | adonis | what you say is reasonable, but I just tried it and it works on my system (ubuntu 16.04). | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:18 | comment | added | dr_ | This won't work as the other permission (which is r--) applies, therefore jdoe will have read access to the file. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:10 | comment | added | adonis | how about seting the group ownership of the file to a group containing only this user and restricting access to group - with chmod 0604? | |
| May 11, 2016 at 14:24 | answer | added | schily | timeline score: -4 | |
| May 11, 2016 at 14:18 | history | asked | dr_ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |