Timeline for Are there still systems around with a /bin/sh binary?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2023 at 9:20 | history | protected | dr_ | ||
| Nov 22, 2016 at 8:19 | comment | added | jlliagre | Related unix.stackexchange.com/questions/98892/… | |
| Nov 11, 2016 at 10:22 | comment | added | Jürgen Schwietering | buildroot for embedded linux systems with small memory footprint often will use just a plain /bin/sh (symlink into busybox). Not sure if you want this to count as system with a /bin/sh binary. | |
| Nov 10, 2016 at 3:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUnix/status/796552479072731136 | ||
| Nov 9, 2016 at 23:42 | comment | added | DisplayName | macOS does. Maybe that counts as FreeBSD. | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 23:24 | answer | added | Dewi Morgan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 18:59 | history | edited | Braiam | edited tags | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 13:12 | comment | added | ninjalj | See also: in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shells | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 10:53 | vote | accept | dr_ | ||
| Nov 9, 2016 at 8:51 | answer | added | jlliagre | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 8:26 | history | edited | dr_ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Added some more info about symlinks |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 8:19 | answer | added | Fox | timeline score: 30 | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | cuonglm | Related unix.stackexchange.com/q/145522/38906 | |
| Nov 9, 2016 at 8:07 | history | asked | dr_ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |