Timeline for S.M.A.R.T shows high Load_Cycle_Count | Why and how to prevent the number from increaseing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2019 at 12:20 | comment | added | AlexOnLinux | Line 102 of that pastebin: Value 001 Worst 001 Thresh 000 - from my knowledge this is means it is almost dead. The other two hard drives are in a better shape, indeed. | |
| Mar 4, 2019 at 11:47 | comment | added | Chris Davies | Given their age those two disks look pretty good to me. No data errors reported. | |
| Mar 4, 2019 at 11:13 | comment | added | AlexOnLinux | yes it might be true that the number should be higher after such a long period of time but compared to all the smart values this Load_Cycle_Count value is the worst i have and might be the cause why i have to replace my disks sooner than later. As you can recheck here the rest of the values are quite fine: pastebin.com/P47S9CfZ | |
| Mar 4, 2019 at 10:57 | history | answered | Chris Davies | CC BY-SA 4.0 |