Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    In my experience, if you need any performance, avoid btrfs. It sure has nice features but performance is not one of those. If you need high performance on spinning rust, try ext4 or XFS instead. For example, see phoronix.com/… Commented May 11, 2020 at 9:15
  • I don't think that's the issue here, but if you do prefer FS features over raw performance, use ZFS instead. It already saved my data once where btrfs couldn't have had, and it's not linux-specific. (EDIT: the "spinning rust" moniker is cute but evidently and inherently wrong.) Commented Jul 12, 2020 at 17:23