Edit - Unix & Linux Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

SMBv1 has serious security vulnerabilities. It was the main attack vector of the "original" WannaCry ransomware. If the remote server does not even support SMBv2 (vers=2.0 for mount -t cifs), it's probably an old Windows Server 2003 system or some NAS system with an out-of-date SMB implementation.

telcoM
– telcoM

2019-10-02 12:43:31 +00:00
Commented Oct 2, 2019 at 12:43
Thanks - a very useful observation. I will try and use v2 and warn them they shouldn't be supporting 1.

the_t_test_1
– the_t_test_1

2019-10-02 15:34:10 +00:00
Commented Oct 2, 2019 at 15:34

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »