Timeline for Migrate shells Solaris ksh to Red Hat
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2021 at 6:56 | comment | added | Chris Davies | Oh I see, you are saying the correct package name is ksh93 rather then ksh? That's fine - we can fix the answer - I don't have RHEL so I guessed at ksh (hence the "something like" part). Thanks | |
| Apr 28, 2021 at 23:58 | comment | added | Marc Wilson | Hm, maybe I'm incorrect and it's Fedora that adopted ksh2020, not RHEL8. If I look on a mirror, the RHEL8 ksh looks like ksh93. In any case, you certainly should not symlink the one to the other. If you want ksh93, you should install it. | |
| Apr 28, 2021 at 23:13 | comment | added | Chris Davies | @MarcWilson that's good to know. Are there any backwards incompatibilities between the two versions? Or any reason why (say) cd /bin && ln -s ksh2020 ksh93 would be a bad idea? | |
| Apr 28, 2021 at 22:52 | comment | added | Marc Wilson | Unless something has changed, installing ksh on RHEL will get you ksh2020, not ksh93. | |
| Apr 24, 2021 at 16:54 | history | edited | Chris Davies | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Information moved from comments to answer |
| Apr 24, 2021 at 15:05 | vote | accept | exharris | ||
| Apr 22, 2021 at 8:38 | history | edited | Stéphane Chazelas | CC BY-SA 4.0 | https://www.thesaurus.com/e/grammar/none/ |
| Apr 22, 2021 at 8:18 | history | edited | terdon♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 1 character in body |
| Apr 22, 2021 at 7:39 | history | edited | Chris Davies | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 193 characters in body |
| Apr 22, 2021 at 7:24 | history | answered | Chris Davies | CC BY-SA 4.0 |