The members of `findutils` [aware of it][1], it's for compatible with *BSD:
> One of the reasons that we skip deletion of "." is for compatibility
> with *BSD, where this action originated.
The **NEWS** in findutils source code shows that they decided to keep the behavior:
> `#20802: If -delete fails, find's exit status will now be non-zero. However, find still skips trying to delete ".".`
**[UPDATE]**
Since this question become one of the hot topic, so i dive into FreeBSD source code and come out a more convincing reason.
Let's see the [find utility source code of FreeBSD][2]:
int
f_delete(PLAN *plan __unused, FTSENT *entry)
{
/* ignore these from fts */
if (strcmp(entry->fts_accpath, ".") == 0 ||
strcmp(entry->fts_accpath, "..") == 0)
return 1;
...
/* rmdir directories, unlink everything else */
if (S_ISDIR(entry->fts_statp->st_mode)) {
if (rmdir(entry->fts_accpath) < 0 && errno != ENOTEMPTY)
warn("-delete: rmdir(%s)", entry->fts_path);
} else {
if (unlink(entry->fts_accpath) < 0)
warn("-delete: unlink(%s)", entry->fts_path);
}
...
As you can see, if it doesn't filter out dot and dot-dot, then it will reach `rmdir()` C function defined by POSIX's `unistd.h`.
Do a simple test, rmdir with dot/dot-dot argument will return -1:
printf("%d\n", rmdir(".."));
Let's take a look [how POSIX describe rmdir][3]:
> If the path argument refers to a path whose final component is either
> dot or dot-dot, rmdir() shall fail.
No reason was given why `shall fail`.
I found `rename` [explain some reaso][4]n:
> Renaming dot or dot-dot is prohibited in order to prevent cyclical
> file system paths.
**Cyclical file system paths** ?
I look over **The C Programming Language (2nd Edition)** and search for directory topic, surprisingly i found [the code is similar][5]:
if(strcmp(dp->name,".") == 0 || strcmp(dp->name,"..") == 0)
continue;
And the comment !
> Each directory always contains entries for itself, called ".", and its
> parent, ".."; these must be skipped, or the program will **loop forever**.
**"loop forever"**, this is same like how `rename` describe it as **"cyclical file system paths"** above.
I slightly modify the code and to make it run in Kali Linux based on [this answer][6]:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <unistd.h>
void fsize(char *);
void dirwalk(char *, void (*fcn)(char *));
int
main(int argc, char **argv) {
if (argc == 1)
fsize(".");
else
while (--argc > 0) {
printf("start\n");
fsize(*++argv);
}
return 0;
}
void fsize(char *name) {
struct stat stbuf;
if (stat(name, &stbuf) == -1 ) {
fprintf(stderr, "fsize: can't access %s\n", name);
return;
}
if ((stbuf.st_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFDIR)
dirwalk(name, fsize);
printf("%81d %s\n", stbuf.st_size, name);
}
#define MAX_PATH 1024
void dirwalk(char *dir, void (*fcn)(char *))
{
char name[MAX_PATH];
struct dirent *dp;
DIR *dfd;
if ((dfd = opendir(dir)) == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "dirwalk: can't open %s\n", dir);
return;
}
while ((dp = readdir(dfd)) != NULL) {
sleep(1);
printf("d_name: S%sG\n", dp->d_name);
if (strcmp(dp->d_name, ".") == 0
|| strcmp(dp->d_name, "..") == 0) {
printf("hole dot\n");
continue;
}
if (strlen(dir)+strlen(dp->d_name)+2 > sizeof(name)) {
printf("mocha\n");
fprintf(stderr, "dirwalk: name %s/%s too long\n",
dir, dp->d_name);
}
else {
printf("ice\n");
(*fcn)(dp->d_name);
}
}
closedir(dfd);
}
Let's see:
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$ ls -la
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 xiaobai xiaobai 4096 Nov 20 04:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 xiaobai xiaobai 4096 Nov 20 04:14 ..
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$ cc /tmp/kr/fsize.c -o /tmp/kr/a.out
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$ /tmp/kr/a.out .
start
d_name: S..G
hole dot
d_name: S.G
hole dot
4096 .
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$
It work correctly, now what if I comment out the `continue` instruction:
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$ cc /tmp/kr/fsize.c -o /tmp/kr/a.out
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$ /tmp/kr/a.out .
start
d_name: S..G
hole dot
ice
d_name: S..G
hole dot
ice
d_name: S..G
hole dot
ice
^C
xb@dnxb:/test/dot$
As you can see, I have to use <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>C</kbd> to kill this infinitely loop program.
The '..' directory read its first entry '..' and loop forever.
**Conclusion:**
1. GNU `findutils` try to compatible with `find` utility in ***BSD**.
2. `find` utility in *BSD internally use `rmdir` POSIX-compliant C function which dot/dot-dot is not allow.
3. The reason of `rmdir` do not allow dot/dot-dot is prevent cyclical file system paths.
4. **The C Programming Language** written by K&R shows the example of how dot/dot-dot will lead to forever loop program.
[1]: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20802
[2]: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/386ddae58459341ec567604707805814a2128a57/usr.bin/find/function.c
[3]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/rmdir.html
[4]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/rename.html
[5]: https://web.archive.org/web/20161119194955/http://www.learntosolveit.com/cprogramming/fsize.html
[6]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7381195/1074998