Timeline for Excluding messages with a given label is ignored if other messges in the conversation lack the label
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14 at 13:38 | comment | added | HaggleLad | Logged in espeically to upvote. Thank you 🙇🏼♂️ | |
| Jun 19, 2024 at 17:22 | comment | added | dimitrieh | For those who want to test the assumptions above with conversation mode on: Unlabel all labels of a conversation, then re-apply the same labels. Your search query now works as expected for that conversation. Every email in that conversation is now labeled the same, thus the results are as expected. | |
| Mar 19, 2024 at 16:05 | comment | added | jaygeek | Just to further clarify: Using quotes around things like From: names with spaces in them can help get good results: Example: (label:scrum AND NOT from:"Azure DevOps") | |
| S Feb 27, 2019 at 23:59 | history | suggested | Neuron | CC BY-SA 4.0 | code highlight, removed clutter |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 13:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 27, 2019 at 23:59 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2018 at 14:43 | vote | accept | Nathan Arthur | ||
| S Dec 18, 2016 at 4:59 | history | suggested | danidemi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | I specify that the case of the logic operators is indeed important. I was not aware that gmail logic operators are case sensitive, so the first time I applied the answer, I wrote them in lower case and the filter didn't work as expected. So, I tried to avoid that error for another reader. |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 12:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 18, 2016 at 4:59 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2016 at 21:10 | review | Late answers | |||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 1:23 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2016 at 20:57 | history | edited | BobJones91827364093485345 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 9 characters in body |
| Aug 26, 2016 at 20:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 26, 2016 at 21:07 | |||||
| Aug 26, 2016 at 20:52 | history | answered | BobJones91827364093485345 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |