Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • I didn't know something like DNS made easy existed. That would be a great way to have the sites quickly rerouted in case of the primary server going down. Commented Jul 14, 2011 at 17:17
  • They're great for general DNS hosting too. I buy domains from my favourite registrar but use DNS Made Easy to host the DNS records. They have multiple nameservers all over the world, so sites resolve fast, load quicker the first time, and don't go down when your registrar's nameservers choke. It's not that expensive either. Commented Jul 14, 2011 at 18:00
  • @Nick: here they say DNS failover (I think the service you syggest in DNS Made Easy) is not recommended: serverfault.com/questions/60553/… What do you think? Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 21:45
  • @Marco They're right to point out that it's not foolproof, but it's worked great for me for a couple of small web apps I manage. Commented Jul 21, 2011 at 15:29
  • 1
    By the way, Stack Exchange uses DNS failover too. Primary data center is in New Yourk, secondary in Oregon. meta.stackexchange.com/a/231138/238706 meta.stackexchange.com/q/207653/238706 Commented Aug 16, 2014 at 14:56