Timeline for What should we do about programming resource recommendation questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://ai.stackexchange.com/ with https://ai.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.ai.stackexchange.com/ with https://ai.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Dec 31, 2016 at 0:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot | | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 0:41 | comment | added | nbro | @BenN Let me tell you just briefly here, because I think a constructive discussion on this website would not lead anywhere, since I know the most common type of person in this websites, who are closed-minded to certain aspects of certain things. Anyway, regarding this website, so far, looking at the qualities of the questions and answers, I don't think this will help improve the field of AI. They all seem opinion or philosophical-based. Everyone with a brain can philosophize. I think this website should be closed. I've read that this should be a "scientific" website. Pls, don't make me laugh. | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 0:31 | comment | added | Ben N Mod | @nbro Indeed, Q&A on tools is an important thing to have, and it can be had at Data Science; requests for tool suggestions can be posted at Software Recommendations. If you have a specific concern about site policy (either of this site or another), I encourage you to post a constructive meta question so we can make things better. | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 0:12 | comment | added | nbro | If I could downvote this question or better this website, I would honestly. Not allowing this website discussing about AI programming tools (not problems) it's completely a waste! Stack Overflow is plenty of incompetent people and it seems that in this website is no different. | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 10:02 | comment | added | quintumnia | @BenN ,basing on my analysis;why is that some questions have up-votes and no answers.Could this mean that voters understand the questions and can't even answer them! | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 9:57 | answer | added | MithicalMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 20:36 | history | edited | Ben NMod | edited tags | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 17:46 | comment | added | Ben N Mod | @quintumnia That could be a good solution; I'd be on board with it. Would you like to write an answer here so people can vote on it? | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 8:18 | comment | added | quintumnia | It's better to create a wiki page on the main site,so that even new users or visitors can easily be informed straight away. | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 11:30 | comment | added | kenorb | We can consider creating a wiki page either on the main site or in meta with some resources, pointing to some books or Coursera courses. | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 21:21 | history | asked | Ben NMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |