Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • Those permissions (466) are really really wrong. They allow the user read-only access, but everyone else read+write access. Except that since they don't allow anyone execute (aka search) access to the directories, nobody can actually access the files inside (just read & maybe write their names). Commented Dec 11, 2011 at 7:02
  • I think you mean chmod 644 Commented Dec 11, 2011 at 9:44
  • 1
    644 makes more sense, but still leaves out execute access (needed for directories). chmod -R u=rwX,go=rX . would work, because chmod treats "X" permission as "x if it makes sense". Commented Dec 11, 2011 at 16:54