Timeline for Should moderators be censors?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:21 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/ | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Migration of MSO links to MSE links | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 2:15 | comment | added | Anonymous Penguin Mod | @jfp It isn't concidered plageism if you cite your source and you rephrase it. | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 16:22 | comment | added | jfpoilpret | I never denied the fact could have had some more content, but I felt this specific article was useful for everyone to know, and I could not just copy its content as that would be called plagiarism. I just complained about the "no prior warning". Regarding the second point, I am against censorship myself so I would not edit that specific part of the answer; I use edit only to improve answer contents (review typos, grammar, or add some more details). For me the best way as to let the poster know about it and let him fix his post himself, which seemed a better way, although it did not work. | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 15:47 | history | answered | hichris123 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |