Timeline for Is it possible to replace this delay with millis()? (And issue with other millis loop)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 at 15:35 | comment | added | Gerben | Sorry again. It seems you already explained/fixed that: If you take care to send the first request in setup() .... | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 15:33 | comment | added | Gerben | Sorry, not really the most accurate word here. The first time you start the code it will read the temperature before you started the first conversion. So the value you get back could be anything. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 15:14 | comment | added | Edgar Bonet | @Gerben: Could you explain why the first read is bogus? | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 13:25 | comment | added | Gerben | Make sure to account for for the fact that the first temperature read is bogus. Other than that, an excellent technique. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 12:11 | history | answered | Edgar Bonet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |