This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Created on 2020-12-02 07:29 by idanweiss97, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Pull Requests
URL Status Linked Edit
PR 23613 merged python-dev, 2020-12-02 07:35
PR 23676 merged xtreak, 2020-12-07 12:50
Messages (4)
msg382403 - (view) Author: Idan Weiss (idanweiss97) * Date: 2020-12-03 12:20
To reproduce: import unittest.mock class LogicInBool: def __bool__(self): print("In Bool!") return True class SomeClass: def __init__(self): self.logic_in_bool = LogicInBool() obj = SomeClass() with unittest.mock.patch.object(obj, 'logic_in_bool', autospec=True): # "In Bool! is printed pass
msg382483 - (view) Author: Karthikeyan Singaravelan (xtreak) * (Python committer) Date: 2020-12-04 12:48
The fix to check for None seems straightforward to me and is only needed for AsyncMock. I would wait for others thoughts on this.
msg382590 - (view) Author: Chris Withers (cjw296) * (Python committer) Date: 2020-12-06 09:59
 New changeset c598a04dd29b89ad072245ddaf738badcfb41ac7 by idanw206 in branch 'master': bpo-42532: Check if NonCallableMock's spec_arg is not None instead of call its __bool__ function (GH23613) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c598a04dd29b89ad072245ddaf738badcfb41ac7 
msg382952 - (view) Author: Karthikeyan Singaravelan (xtreak) * (Python committer) Date: 2020-12-14 05:49
 New changeset 14f2a124e20081b8981c8d6165dbd78d11b6808c by Karthikeyan Singaravelan in branch '3.9': [3.9] bpo-42532: Check if NonCallableMock's spec_arg is not None instead of call its __bool__ function (GH-23613) (GH-23676) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/14f2a124e20081b8981c8d6165dbd78d11b6808c 
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:59:38adminsetgithub: 86698
2020-12-14 05:49:25xtreaksetmessages: + msg382952
2020-12-07 12:50:41xtreaksetpull_requests: + pull_request22542
2020-12-06 22:45:57idanweiss97setstatus: open -> closed
resolution: fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
2020-12-06 09:59:59cjw296setmessages: + msg382590
2020-12-04 12:48:02xtreaksetnosy: + cjw296, michael.foord, lisroach, mariocj89, xtreak
messages: + msg382483
2020-12-03 12:20:26idanweiss97setmessages: + msg382403
2020-12-02 07:35:11python-devsetkeywords: + patch
nosy: + python-dev

pull_requests: + pull_request22480
stage: patch review
2020-12-02 07:29:30idanweiss97create