Timeline for Help us come up with rules who should be rewarded with an iPad2 for making the site great
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2011 at 4:11 | comment | added | MtnViewMark | Rather than stress quantity, I'd go for the best question in a given period of time. "Best" shouldn't just be the number of votes the questions gets, but should also reflect that it induced great answers. So here's my strawman: Score a question by # of votes for the question + the # votes for the top three answers. | |
| May 4, 2011 at 17:45 | comment | added | Casey | Oops, you have the first answer on my end. Looks like I scrolled to far. No offense to fR0DDY then. | |
| May 4, 2011 at 17:13 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @Casey, why would I be offended? It's not my question. | |
| May 3, 2011 at 21:28 | comment | added | Casey | I like this idea as well. We've a shortage of questions (when compared to answers), especially non-golf questions. If only there was some way to judge the complexity or depth of a question. For example Prisoners and Boxes took considerable more setup/prep time than, say, Happy Numbers (no offense to peter taylor, just illustrating the differences). | |
| May 3, 2011 at 9:31 | comment | added | Joey | Just to note: The number of answers is not necessarily what makes a question good/great/interesting. It could also just mean that it's trivial and everyone can chime in with a one-liner that is golfed to the max on first sight. That's not to mean that questions without answers are preferred, though ;-) | |
| May 2, 2011 at 21:44 | history | answered | Keith Randall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |