Timeline for Is ImageMagick a programming language?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 31, 2016 at 11:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/715495745370112000 | ||
| Mar 29, 2016 at 21:51 | history | edited | Sparr | CC BY-SA 3.0 | final question |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 18:05 | comment | added | Sparr | @Doorknob there's some controversy over just how broad of a selection of non-programming-language binaries should be usable in a bash/shell solution. also, the purpose of this question is so I don't have to count " $1" in my code size, or maybe even "convert " | |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 18:00 | answer | added | user45941 | timeline score: 15 | |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 17:02 | comment | added | Doorknob Mod | Note that ImageMagick answers can frequently simply be submitted as Bash/shell answers, using the ImageMagick commands (convert, etc.) | |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 16:40 | history | edited | Sparr | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 63 characters in body |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 16:27 | history | edited | Sparr | CC BY-SA 3.0 | add images |
| Mar 29, 2016 at 16:17 | history | asked | Sparr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |