Timeline for Three-Three-Three!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 22:50 | history | edited | mbomb007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 80 characters in body |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 22:35 | comment | added | Sp3000 | Even more naive: print~9;print~9;print~9; | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:59 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @FlipTack Fixed it, and I feel like I just hit an optimal solution for when the trailing newline isn't forgiven. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:58 | history | edited | mbomb007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 3 characters in body |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:49 | history | edited | mbomb007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 233 characters in body |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:43 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @ETHproductions Sure. It depends how naive we're being. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:36 | comment | added | FlipTack | OP has clarified that the single trailing newline is not allowed (see comments). | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:33 | comment | added | ETHproductions | Could you not do print 123;print 123;print 123; for the naive solution? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:06 | history | edited | mbomb007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 127 characters in body |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:05 | comment | added | ETHproductions | You could do print"""printprint*3*3"""*3 for a much shorter output ;-) | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 20:00 | history | answered | mbomb007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |