Timeline for Iterated phi sequence
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2021 at 22:36 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 | deleted 154 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 18:20 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @Dennis Yeah, I'm starting to understand it now. Thanks! | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | Dennis | It's not that different from your original code. ÐĿ loops until ÆṪ returns a list of 99 ones, >1 maps all non-1 values to 1, then S sums, effectively counting the number of non-1's in each column. | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 18:10 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @dylnan There is a chat room specifically about asking questions about Jelly, and another about learning Jelly, just to let you know, as you seem interested in the language. | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 18:08 | comment | added | dylnan | @Dennis or anyone else: is it possible in a # loop to return a list of the truthy values found instead of the list of indices which evaluate to a truthy value? | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 18:05 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 141 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 17:53 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 28 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 17:50 | comment | added | Mr. Xcoder | @cairdcoinheringaahing That was a golfing suggestion, so go ahead and edit that in | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 17:46 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @Mr.Xcoder Do you mind if I "take" that as a golf? | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 17:20 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 51 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 17:17 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @HyperNeutrino Aww, but now I have to rewrite the explanation :P Thanks | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:26 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @dylnan Possibly, but as we're generating a fixed list, to apply over each element, € is usually better than #. | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:23 | comment | added | dylnan | And with regards to the code, would it be possible to use # in this case? Something like this (which clearly doesn't work but written by someone who understands the syntax clearly!) | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:21 | comment | added | dylnan | You're right, I had read the beginning of the challenge and didn't read the rules part clearly | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:18 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 474 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:09 | comment | added | Simply Beautiful Art | @dylnan The challenge asks to output f for n=2 to n=100, not just one value. | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:09 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing♦ | @dylnan All three answers output the list of f(n) from 2 to 100, and the question doesn't mention input, so I think this is the correct version | |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 16:04 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 8 characters in body |
| Dec 4, 2017 at 15:59 | history | answered | caird coinheringaahing♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |