Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • \$\begingroup\$ I was going to suggest 2^(l*r)+2^(t*b)==4100 to check the numbers, but it seems both our solutions are tricked by 2,6 in place of 3,4. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2018 at 19:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ @xnor but the numbers are restricted to 0..4 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2018 at 20:01
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Οurous Thanks, I missed that. Then arithmetic expressions can be optimized even more, like (l*r-1)*(t*b-1)==11. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2018 at 20:04