Timeline for Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
47 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2024 at 4:01 | answer | added | l4m2 | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Aug 25, 2024 at 23:10 | vote | accept | Kevin Cruijssen | ||
| Aug 25, 2024 at 15:17 | answer | added | Unrelated String | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 30, 2020 at 12:05 | vote | accept | Kevin Cruijssen | ||
| S Aug 25, 2024 at 23:10 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2020 at 11:39 | answer | added | ais523 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot | Commonmark migration | |
| Apr 29, 2019 at 6:43 | vote | accept | Kevin Cruijssen | ||
| Oct 30, 2020 at 12:05 | |||||
| Apr 21, 2019 at 7:16 | answer | added | digEmAll | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 19, 2019 at 23:04 | answer | added | Chas Brown | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 19, 2019 at 8:02 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @Arnauld Oh. Ah well, luckily inspirational links aren't necessary for the actual challenge, nor for it to be self-contained. Will leave it like this, even though the SO post doesn't exist anymore. | |
| Apr 19, 2019 at 7:33 | comment | added | Arnauld | FYI, the first linked SO question is no more. | |
| Apr 19, 2019 at 4:52 | answer | added | Jonah | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 19, 2019 at 1:50 | answer | added | xnor | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 20:10 | answer | added | Gymhgy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 18:59 | answer | added | Giuseppe | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 14:15 | answer | added | nimi | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 13:56 | answer | added | Giuseppe | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 9:24 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @user2357112 Changed it to subsequences. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 9:23 | history | edited | Kevin Cruijssen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Term powersets(-sublists) changed to subsequences |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 9:18 | comment | added | user2357112 | The classical term is "subsequence". This has the same problem of people thinking of contiguous subsequences, though. I would say "subset" if we were actually working with sets here, but these are definitely sequences - order matters and duplicates are allowed. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 9:15 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @user2357112 What would be the correct term here then? Powerset-sublists or something like that? With just the term sublists I think of consecutive elements. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 9:03 | comment | added | user2357112 | @KevinCruijssen: That whole output in your link is the power set of [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The individual sublists aren't all power sets. "Power set" is not a correct term to describe what this challenge is asking for. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 8:16 | answer | added | att | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 7:05 | history | edited | Kevin Cruijssen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 272 characters in body |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 7:04 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @Shaggy No sorry, either the values, or the key-value pairs with index/value. Sorry. I'll edit the challenge to mention it. | |
| Apr 18, 2019 at 3:50 | answer | added | t-clausen.dk | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 22:19 | comment | added | Shaggy | Just to be sure: outputting the indices isn't an option, is it? | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 21:49 | answer | added | Shaggy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 20:03 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 17:54 | answer | added | ais523 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 17:51 | answer | added | Zgarb | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 16:48 | history | edited | Kevin Cruijssen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 391 characters in body |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 16:47 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @Arnauld Yes, if the values are key-value pairs with their index it's clear which indexed values are meant in the input, so they can be in any order. Will also edit this into the challenge description. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 16:45 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @ExpiredData I initially had sublists as term in the challenge, but then I remembered that 05AB1E/Jelly/Pyth and alike call non-adjacent sublists powersets, so I changed it to that term. For example, here the powerset of the list [1,2,3,4,5] in 05AB1E, for which the resulting inner lists also aren't in order. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 16:44 | comment | added | Kevin Cruijssen | @NickKennedy Yes, that's allowed, will edit the description. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 15:40 | answer | added | bugs | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 15:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/1118529902372950016 | ||
| Apr 17, 2019 at 15:00 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 17, 2019 at 14:56 | answer | added | Arnauld | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 14:39 | answer | added | Emigna | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 14:33 | answer | added | ZaMoC | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 14:19 | comment | added | Expired Data | powersetis a set of subsets isn't it? but it looks like you are returning a set of subsequences? [4,5,4,3] would result in either [4,4] where [4,4] is clearly not a set. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 14:15 | answer | added | Nick Kennedy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 13:53 | comment | added | Nick Kennedy | If there is more than one identical set (but from different indices) is it ok to list all of them? e.g. [5,100,5] twice for your third example. | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 13:40 | answer | added | Sok | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 13:24 | history | edited | Kevin Cruijssen | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 96 characters in body; edited title |
| Apr 17, 2019 at 13:19 | history | asked | Kevin Cruijssen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |