Timeline for Hello world! with NO repetition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
60 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2023 at 9:21 | answer | added | Bubbler | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 30, 2023 at 7:37 | answer | added | Bubbler | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2023 at 13:03 | answer | added | winapiadmin | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Feb 9, 2023 at 0:46 | history | bounty ended | lyxal♦ | ||
| S Feb 9, 2023 at 0:46 | history | notice removed | lyxal♦ | ||
| Feb 5, 2023 at 19:53 | answer | added | c-- | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Feb 4, 2023 at 2:44 | history | bounty started | lyxal♦ | ||
| S Feb 4, 2023 at 2:44 | history | notice added | lyxal♦ | Reward existing answer | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 1:04 | answer | added | 97.100.97.109 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 17, 2021 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 17, 2021 at 18:05 | |||||
| Jan 12, 2021 at 22:08 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 1:52 | |||||
| Jan 12, 2021 at 20:28 | history | reopened | The Fifth Marshal Dingus caird coinheringaahing♦ lyxal♦ Xcali | ||
| Jan 12, 2021 at 3:08 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 12, 2021 at 20:28 | |||||
| Jan 12, 2021 at 2:30 | history | closed | Wheat Wizard♦ | Needs more focus | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 3:44 | comment | added | S.S. Anne | "should not use any built-in libraries" makes it impossible for I/O in languages like C and C++ where the I/O is in a built-in library. | |
| Jan 23, 2020 at 6:04 | answer | added | lyxal♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 23, 2020 at 1:36 | comment | added | lyxal♦ | What do you think this is... The radio program "Just a Minute?" | |
| Sep 4, 2018 at 10:58 | answer | added | Kirill L. | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 8, 2018 at 17:05 | comment | added | Kirill L. | To be more specific, here is my current solution. Do you think it's OK? | |
| Apr 8, 2018 at 17:03 | comment | added | Kirill L. | @Timtech, I'm trying to solve this in Ruby, and the idea is using "-p" flag that runs the script once for each input line with implicit print. With empty input it just won't run at all. I've seen people using a trick that makes this flag work without input in Perl, but I couldn't find a functional Ruby equivalent. | |
| Apr 8, 2018 at 15:27 | comment | added | Timtech | @KirillL. That could be okay in the same spirit as a command-line flag (so it still counts towards the bytecount), but I'm not understanding why you would need input if the contents of the input doesn't matter. | |
| Apr 8, 2018 at 7:16 | comment | added | Kirill L. | The rule about "getting no input" - is it intended just to close a loophole (like fetching missing chars from elsewhere), or does it actually forbid to make any use of STDIN? Say, if I have a program that needs a single line of input to run correctly (the content doesn't matter, it could be any single hardcoded char unused in the code, it just must be non-empty), would this count as a violation? | |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 6:30 | answer | added | Weijun Zhou | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 5:03 | history | edited | Timtech | CC BY-SA 3.0 | All answers which require implementations that are newer than this challenge must be marked as non-competing. |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 5:02 | comment | added | Timtech | @MDXF Alright, I added it for this challenge specifically then. | |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 0:30 | comment | added | MD XF | @Timtech No, the rule requiring languages created after challenges to be marked as non-competing has phased out, per this meta thread by me and Martin Ender. | |
| Feb 24, 2018 at 4:56 | comment | added | Timtech | @MDXF Don't worry, that language was created after the challenge was posted. | |
| Feb 23, 2018 at 3:46 | comment | added | MD XF | I know this challenge is old, but would you mind adding Help, WarDoq! to the list of disallowed languages? | |
| Feb 21, 2018 at 0:46 | comment | added | Jonathan Frech | So since Dom Hastings' answer seems to follow the specs, are command line arguments ignored? | |
| Feb 19, 2018 at 9:51 | answer | added | BlackCap | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 19, 2018 at 3:35 | answer | added | Jo King | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 10:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 6, 2017 at 10:28 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2016 at 10:22 | history | edited | Toby Speight | Added relevant tag | |
| Apr 4, 2014 at 10:45 | vote | accept | Timtech | ||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | Timwi | “should only use ASCII characters” — what a draconian restriction. That removes an entire class of languages that don’t happen to use ASCII. | |
| Jan 23, 2014 at 18:39 | answer | added | Ilmari Karonen | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 12:39 | comment | added | vek | About ASCII only: a few days ago i heard some bad things about developers of programming languages (C#, Java, ...), because they said that his language supports unicode, but at the same time don't do a correct abstraction of unicode. The length function returns the length in bytes instead of characters, for example. Now talking about ASCII only could be interpreted as discriminatory, because natural languages with more or other letters are handicapped. | |
| Jan 22, 2014 at 4:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/425843154475290624 | ||
| Jan 21, 2014 at 22:47 | comment | added | Timtech | @RyanCarlson Okay, added them. | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 22:47 | history | edited | Timtech | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 28 characters in body |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 21:57 | comment | added | The Guy with The Hat | You should also disallow "Hello", "HQ9+B", and "CHIQRSX9+" | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 21:38 | answer | added | aaaaaaaaaaaa | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 20:38 | comment | added | null | That was a great puzzle, and I enjoyed doing it :-). | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 20:29 | answer | added | null | timeline score: 38 | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 13:05 | answer | added | Dom Hastings | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 11:04 | comment | added | Timtech | @tobyink Yes, they are ASCII. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 10:10 | comment | added | FireFly | @tobyink I don't see why not. ASCII should include all bytes 0-127, and after all LF and CR are control characters too. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 10:07 | comment | added | tobyink | Are ASCII control characters allowed? | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 8:13 | comment | added | Victor Stafusa | Are Huby and CHIQRSX9+ allowed? | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 3:47 | comment | added | vek | Why ASCII only? | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 0:21 | comment | added | Timtech | @FireFly Yeah, it's necessary. | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 23:44 | comment | added | FireFly | Is the "followed by a newline" requirement really necessary? This is hard! D: | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 23:15 | comment | added | Eliseo D'Annunzio | Just checking, buddy! :) | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 23:00 | history | edited | Timtech | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 6 characters in body |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 23:00 | comment | added | Timtech | @Eliseod'Annunzio No, I'm sorry. | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 22:58 | comment | added | Timtech | @Victor "should only use ASCII characters" | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 22:48 | comment | added | Victor Stafusa | What about piet? | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 22:40 | comment | added | Eliseo D'Annunzio | if We are escaping character codes, can the "\" character be used more than once? | |
| Jan 19, 2014 at 22:27 | history | asked | Timtech | CC BY-SA 3.0 |