Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This feels like it isn't a serious contender, since the language only appears to care about the number of words in a line, and there are a lot of words with many more letters than necessary in them. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2020 at 22:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ @pppery you are, of course, right. I golfed it and included both the golfed and verbose versions. The verbose version is MUCH funnier to read :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 11, 2020 at 12:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't disagree, but I've chosen to focus my energy on objective rule enforcement over reading funny answers. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2020 at 1:37
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @pppery yes, thank you for your objectivity :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2020 at 6:26
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @pppery I have just seen your profile again and I find the seemingly-new sentence "But I cannot be dissuaded -- I will keep on hunting for old invalid answers and close-voting questions like I've always done." even more worrying than everything I have ever seen there so far... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2020 at 11:57