Skip to main content
Code Golf

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Definitely interesting, but the convention here is that submissions should theoretically work for higher inputs (I know this is debatable). My suggestion is to actually apply exponential spacing so that at least it doesn't conceptually break. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 5:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Bubbler All right I will modify it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 7:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Bubbler I am coding from the phone an if instead of j-n and j+n I put j-n*n and j+n*n (correcting also the position of slashes and backslashes, the starting column of the root and the size of the array) I can only see till tree #4, cause the width of #5 doesn't fit in the screen and character go on a new line. I don't know if doing n*n would be enough, maybe is already too much or maybe not. I guess that putting j-pow(n,n) would be safe and doesn't conceptually break, but my trees would become an abstraction that nobody could see. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You can always include two versions of code: one for theoretically working (therefore valid for the challenge), and another for human-observable/whatever interesting stuff (this doesn't need to be valid for the challenge). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 23:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ahaha all right I will add a valid code \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 4, 2021 at 23:36