added 272 characters in body

edited Apr 5, 2014 at 14:31

4.7k
21
25

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5 4):

(thanks Claudiu)

"string"in["string"]

original:

"string" in["string"]

Alternative Alternative Alternative Bendy-ruly Python (2):

"string"is"string"

Nothing was said about comparison keywords (This is not a serious submission, just something that occurred to me...)

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5 4):

(thanks Claudiu)

"string"in["string"]

original:

"string" in["string"]

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5 4):

(thanks Claudiu)

"string"in["string"]

original:

"string" in["string"]

Alternative Alternative Alternative Bendy-ruly Python (2):

"string"is"string"

Nothing was said about comparison keywords (This is not a serious submission, just something that occurred to me...)

added 27 characters in body

Source Link

edited Mar 27, 2014 at 21:28

ɐɔıʇǝɥʇuʎs

4.7k
21
25

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (55 4):

(thanks Claudiu)

"string"in["string"]

original:

"string" in["string"]

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5):

"string" in["string"]

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5 4):

(thanks Claudiu)

"string"in["string"]

original:

"string" in["string"]

added 313 characters in body

Source Link

edited Mar 14, 2014 at 0:06

ɐɔıʇǝɥʇuʎs

4.7k
21
25

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternatively: (8 7)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!

Alternative alternative Python (5):

"string" in["string"]

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternatively: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

Python (17 11):

b in a in b

(Checks if b is contained in a and a is contained in b, if that wasn't clear from the code.)

Alternative python: (8 7)

derived from Tom Verelst's Go solution:

b in[a]

Bonus: this works for any type.

EDIT:

Wait a second, just read that you can also directly program in the strings, and don't have to count quotes... (or at least, that what golfscript does). So... Python on par with golfscript? Oh my!