Timeline for Arranging pins on a microchip
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 12:28 | comment | added | Jonathan Van Matre | @gggg The p(m,n) function also requires a print statement to display correctly, so in the end my array constructor was the cheaper approach once you take out the necessary steps for the G and V pins...but still too long to get the bonus. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 12:23 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 524 characters in body |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 3:28 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 12 characters in body |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 17:50 | comment | added | gggg | p(m,n)=(a="+";b="\n";c=a^m*b;c*(a*" "^(m-2)*a*b)^n*c) returns the ops pattern in a string the OPs pattern in 46 characters after the =, might be able to work it in for a small bonus if you can find any more efficiency. | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 17:38 | comment | added | gggg | m(x)=(s=iceil(x/4);p=4s-x;(4s,s,iceil(p/2),ifloor(p/2))) is shorter, since Julia returns the result of the last statement. | |
| Mar 17, 2014 at 16:27 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 150 characters in body |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 6:45 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 9 characters in body |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 6:36 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 664 characters in body |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 5:17 | history | edited | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 177 characters in body |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 5:11 | history | answered | Jonathan Van Matre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |