Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

12
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 Applause! I vaguely thought about this, but found it too difficult to implement. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 27, 2014 at 21:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is brilliant. I've got an entry submitted, but I like yours better because of the key image feature. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 28, 2014 at 3:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'd be curious what these two images look like keyed against each other: lardlad.com/assets/wallpaper/simpsons1920.jpg and blogs.nd.edu/oblation/files/2013/09/BreakingBad.jpg (downsized to 720x450 or whatever makes sense, and of course pre-converted to PNG to avoid the JPEG burn). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 28, 2014 at 3:36
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @ToddLehman my algorithm is limited by the need to be its own inverse. If you want to see some really interesting approaches to shuffling one image to resemble another, you should look at American Gothic in the palette of Mona Lisa. Some of those programs would do amazing things with the images you mention. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 28, 2014 at 10:05
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The key image feature puts this head and shoulders above the rest. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 14:19