Timeline for What's that number in Shortlex?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 14:51 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @Optimizer I don't agree with that. For starters, J and APL aren't golfing languages and win about as often as GolfScript and CJam. But moreover, golfing isn't about the green checkmark but about beating submissions "in your league". If I write a Ruby submission that beats all but the those 4 languages I can be quite happy about that, and I don't need those to be banned to enjoy golfing in more verbose languages. In fact, a clever golf in a "normal" language like edc's is much more likely to get a lot of upvotes than a naive (but shorter) implementation in a golfing language. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 192 characters in body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 13:56 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @Optimizer I'm sure if someone used that approach in one of the golfing languages they'd get below 20. (That being said, I can't quite reach 44 in Ruby with that approach... currently at 45) | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:58 | comment | added | Falko | Sure. I guess I won't catch you anyway with my lengthy Python code. ;) | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:54 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 65 characters in body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:41 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | edited body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:34 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 6 characters in body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:28 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 8 characters in body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:21 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 8 characters in body |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 12:15 | history | answered | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 |