Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm sorry, this may be dumb, but how do you get 10 with only three 1s? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 15:43
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @FryAmTheEggman 11-1 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 15:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Ah, so I was dumb :p \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 22, 2014 at 15:47
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ That's a very vague rule. I may decide that the square root of 1, the square root of the square root of 1, etc. are all different approaches and I have an infinite number of answers. Is a+b different from b+a? Is (-a) * (-b) different from b * a? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 24, 2014 at 8:18
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I am aware of this, but I cannot represent 4^(4^(4^(4^4))) in any regular number format – storing 4^(4^(4^4)) as an integer already needs more bits than there are atoms in the universe). So unless I use a computer algebra system capable of handling such numbers (if one exists at all), I need to treat these as special cases. This however almost certainly requires more characters than I win by overkilled. Therefore these awards are pointless unless you somewhat exclude multiple square roots. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 24, 2014 at 18:42