Skip to main content
Code Golf

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't think this should qualify as 1) AutoLISP is just a dialect of LISP and 2) it's practically identical to the already existing LISP answer. The question's author will be in a better position to say if it's okay or not though. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 18:39
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ This will be the 4th version of LISP. Practically identical is not identical, given the princ instead of print. Many many other answers are practically identical, hell, some are even are identical. Where do we draw the line? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 19:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ @agweber The plain Lisp answer also uses princ. The question isn't how similar (or different) it is to other language answers, but to that answer. If we allow answers like this then I got at least 10 identical Lisp dialect answers coming right up. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 19:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @user3490 yes.. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 20:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There is no plain Lisp. Answer 48 did not specify which "Lisp". If it was Common Lisp, then there are many Lisps that are not Common Lisp. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 21, 2014 at 20:14