Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ I think you are the last one standing. Unless somebody can compress ppuppPq([#fwSmdP[ in 15 bytes AND output it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 20:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ @sanchises If anyone does, I'd award a bounty. Because it would be just that good. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 20:12
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @sanchises If only there was some esoteric language which outputted the program with all occurrences of p replaced with pp. Then a solution would be pupPq([#fwSmdP[. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 20:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @bcsb1001 Yes, I thought of something like that recently; an esoteric language where each command is a winning challenge solution on this site, and uses the output of that command as the input for the next command. It would be awesome if somebody could program anything in that. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 20:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @sanchises But would that break a standard loophole rule by going out to the internet? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 7, 2015 at 20:38