Timeline for Can you Meta Quine?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 15, 2012 at 18:07 | comment | added | Gaffi | A bit biased, are we? ;-) | |
| Apr 15, 2012 at 12:54 | history | edited | PhiNotPi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 55 characters in body |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 17:22 | history | edited | PhiNotPi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | shortened Element solution |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 1:11 | history | edited | PhiNotPi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added Perl solution |
| Apr 14, 2012 at 0:08 | comment | added | PhiNotPi | I think this definitively, beyond any doubt, proves the validity of Element as a programming language. It is so easy to use that I, so inexperienced that I have only managed to write one complete interpreter for Element, have been able to answer this question before any other person on this entire planet of 7,000,000,000 people. Element's "one character, one function, all the time" paradigm means that all code is completely unambiguous. The language is versatile: except for []{}, any command can be placed anywhere in the entire program without causing a syntax error. It is perfect. | |
| Apr 13, 2012 at 19:40 | history | answered | PhiNotPi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |