Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 27
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the justification "Because they are only 16 characters in hexadecimal, your code will need to be as short as possible." \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 19, 2015 at 18:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ A test case that passes through a zero digit (which is an important edge case for my current approach): 749699 -> B7083 -> 27083 -> 69CB -> 6932 -> 1B14 -> 1214 -> 4BE -> 425 -> 1A9 -> 119 -> 77 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 19, 2015 at 18:53
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Test case 153. Step 1 > 99, Step 2 --> 99, Step 3 --> 63, output 63. Correct? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 21, 2015 at 12:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes for 153 I had not seen the code Flow explanation... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 30, 2019 at 9:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ For what it's worth... 3 out of the top 4 answers return 99 on input 153 and Dennis's seg-faults on the current version of Jelly. I'm going to quit testing while I'm ahead :) Are we sure that example is correct? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 31, 2019 at 4:31