Timeline for Hexadecimal and the Alphabet
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
35 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2019 at 12:03 | history | edited | Titus | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added test case `153` |
| Jan 31, 2019 at 11:24 | answer | added | Titus | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 31, 2019 at 4:31 | comment | added | dana | For what it's worth... 3 out of the top 4 answers return 99 on input 153 and Dennis's seg-faults on the current version of Jelly. I'm going to quit testing while I'm ahead :) Are we sure that example is correct? | |
| Jan 30, 2019 at 11:35 | answer | added | dana | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 30, 2019 at 9:51 | comment | added | user58988 | Yes for 153 I had not seen the code Flow explanation... | |
| Jan 30, 2019 at 9:21 | answer | added | user58988 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 28, 2019 at 22:44 | answer | added | voidhawk | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 23:28 | answer | added | Shaggy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 24, 2019 at 18:54 | answer | added | Kamil Drakari | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 17, 2019 at 18:55 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2018 at 22:40 | answer | added | Sumner18 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 1:27 | vote | accept | Downgoat | ||
| Dec 21, 2015 at 12:09 | comment | added | edc65 | Test case 153. Step 1 > 99, Step 2 --> 99, Step 3 --> 63, output 63. Correct? | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 10:57 | answer | added | quintopia | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 11:35 | answer | added | Tim Pederick | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 0:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/678371151131877377 | ||
| Dec 19, 2015 at 23:05 | answer | added | Digital Trauma | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 22:04 | history | edited | Dennis | edited tags | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 21:32 | answer | added | Jase | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 21:10 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 20:42 | answer | added | Alex A. | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:58 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:56 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:45 | answer | added | basile-henry | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:32 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:30 | answer | added | SuperJedi224 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:21 | answer | added | LegionMammal978 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 19:13 | history | edited | Timwi | CC BY-SA 3.0 | sp |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:53 | comment | added | Martin Ender | A test case that passes through a zero digit (which is an important edge case for my current approach): 749699 -> B7083 -> 27083 -> 69CB -> 6932 -> 1B14 -> 1214 -> 4BE -> 425 -> 1A9 -> 119 -> 77 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:51 | history | edited | Doorknob | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 34 characters in body |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:47 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 13 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:32 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:29 | comment | added | cat | +1 for the justification "Because they are only 16 characters in hexadecimal, your code will need to be as short as possible." | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:27 | answer | added | histocrat | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 19, 2015 at 18:21 | history | asked | Downgoat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |