Timeline for Is it a prefix code?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
49 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 16, 2019 at 14:22 | history | bounty ended | Adám | ||
| S Apr 16, 2019 at 14:22 | history | notice removed | Adám | ||
| Apr 12, 2019 at 2:09 | answer | added | Jo King | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 21:51 | answer | added | recursive | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 15:21 | answer | added | Robin Ryder | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 14:20 | answer | added | Innat3 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 8:04 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 11, 2019 at 4:51 | answer | added | Jonah | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 16:37 | answer | added | Shaggy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 15:19 | answer | added | LambdaBeta | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Apr 10, 2019 at 14:52 | history | bounty started | Adám | ||
| S Apr 10, 2019 at 14:52 | history | notice added | Adám | Reward existing answer | |
| Mar 10, 2019 at 21:14 | answer | added | voidhawk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 10, 2019 at 10:57 | answer | added | Unrelated String | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Nov 16, 2016 at 18:08 | answer | added | rnso | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 16, 2016 at 16:35 | answer | added | A Simmons | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 16, 2016 at 15:26 | history | edited | user45941 | edited tags | |
| May 19, 2016 at 16:24 | vote | accept | DJMcMayhem | ||
| May 6, 2016 at 20:09 | answer | added | lad2025 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 6, 2016 at 13:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/728579979152347137 | ||
| May 2, 2016 at 16:10 | comment | added | DJMcMayhem | @Joba It depends on what your keys are. If you have 0, 00, 1, 11 all as keys, this is not a prefix-code because 0 is a prefix of 00, and 1 is a prefix of 11. A prefix code is where none of the keys starts with another key. So for example, if your keys are 0, 10, 11 this is a prefix code and uniquely decipherable. 001 is not a valid message, but 0011 or 0010 are uniquely decipherable. | |
| May 2, 2016 at 16:07 | history | edited | DJMcMayhem | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 42 characters in body |
| May 2, 2016 at 15:01 | answer | added | Pokechu22 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 14:19 | answer | added | DavidC | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 13:21 | comment | added | Joba | Just out of curiosity: The challenge says: "The biggest advantage of this, is that the encoded text can be written down with no separator between them, and it will still be uniquely decipherable.". How would something like 001 be uniquely decipherable? It could be either 00, 1 or 0, 11. | |
| May 2, 2016 at 9:38 | answer | added | Jacob | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 9:00 | answer | added | xnor | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 8:46 | answer | added | xnor | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 8:10 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 8:01 | answer | added | Patrick Roberts | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 7:59 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 7:23 | answer | added | DJMcMayhem | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 7:01 | answer | added | edc65 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 6:52 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @DrGreenEggsandHamDJ I don't think that answer is meant to address the consistency of outputs at all, hence the question. ;) | |
| May 2, 2016 at 6:51 | comment | added | DJMcMayhem | @MartinBüttner Any positive integer is fine. | |
| May 2, 2016 at 6:50 | comment | added | Martin Ender | Do you want a consistent truthy value or could it be e.g. "some positive integer" (which might vary between different inputs). | |
| May 2, 2016 at 6:11 | answer | added | Michael Klein | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 4:10 | answer | added | ezrast | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 2:25 | answer | added | Winny | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 1:56 | answer | added | Marv | timeline score: 9 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 1:46 | answer | added | izzyg | timeline score: 12 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 1:33 | history | edited | DJMcMayhem | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 48 characters in body |
| May 2, 2016 at 1:28 | answer | added | Maltysen | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 2, 2016 at 1:23 | history | asked | DJMcMayhem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |