Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ More testcases please. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 26, 2016 at 8:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What exactly are the guidelines mentioned in Revision 9? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 26, 2016 at 23:24
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm reopening this. I think Peter's concerns have been addressed and we have a fairly clear consensus on what counts as a duplicate, and this challenge doesn't meet those criteria. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 27, 2016 at 11:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ "Overflow and underflow wrap in a predictable and sane manner" - so 127+1 wraps to 0 and -128-1 also wraps to 0, correct? That's one possible predictable and sane manner. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 29, 2016 at 5:16
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @immibis Exactly. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 29, 2016 at 14:46