Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Found a method which takes 56 bytes \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 14, 2019 at 22:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks @Xcali! With you suggestion managed to get it down to 54. And some added obfuscation for entertainment... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 19:37