Timeline for Solve the Laplace equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2017 at 21:31 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 81 characters in body |
| May 20, 2017 at 21:02 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 583 characters in body |
| Nov 13, 2016 at 21:52 | comment | added | user58988 | here the numeric solution seems ok if i change digits to 80 or 70 -> g(sin(2*%pi*x),1,1,1/19) 1.0082247336 3696433338 0661957738 9922742670 7044082938 1577926908 950765832 the other number 1.0082247336 3696433338 0661957738 9922742670 7044082938 1577926... | |
| Nov 13, 2016 at 21:49 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 167 characters in body |
| Nov 13, 2016 at 11:01 | comment | added | Karl Napf | The numerical solution differs from the exact solution because the FDM here is only second order, that means only polynomials up to order 2 can be represented exactly. So only the f=-2 example has a matching analytical and numerical solution. | |
| Nov 12, 2016 at 23:49 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 51 characters in body |
| Nov 12, 2016 at 23:41 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 482 characters in body |
| Nov 12, 2016 at 23:05 | history | edited | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 34 characters in body |
| Nov 12, 2016 at 22:40 | history | answered | user58988 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |