Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Heslacher
  • 51k
  • 20
  • 35

Moderators have a role that is much closer aligned to Stack Exchange as a corporation than the role of "just another high-rep user". This can mean enforcing policies that you'd like theto see implemented differently, lobbying for change in those policies or any number of interactions that are not available to "your normal everyday user".

What do you think of that prospect?

If you could change one policy (be it SE-wide or CR), which would that be and why?

Moderators have a role that is much closer aligned to Stack Exchange as a corporation than the role of "just another high-rep user". This can mean enforcing policies that you'd like the see implemented differently, lobbying for change in those policies or any number of interactions that are not available to "your normal everyday user".

What do you think of that prospect?

If you could change one policy (be it SE-wide or CR), which would that be and why?

Moderators have a role that is much closer aligned to Stack Exchange as a corporation than the role of "just another high-rep user". This can mean enforcing policies that you'd like to see implemented differently, lobbying for change in those policies or any number of interactions that are not available to "your normal everyday user".

What do you think of that prospect?

If you could change one policy (be it SE-wide or CR), which would that be and why?

Source Link
Vogel612 Mod
  • 25.5k
  • 1
  • 38
  • 64

Moderators have a role that is much closer aligned to Stack Exchange as a corporation than the role of "just another high-rep user". This can mean enforcing policies that you'd like the see implemented differently, lobbying for change in those policies or any number of interactions that are not available to "your normal everyday user".

What do you think of that prospect?

If you could change one policy (be it SE-wide or CR), which would that be and why?