Timeline for MathJax on CodeReview
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 19, 2014 at 10:43 | history | edited | 200_successMod | edited tags | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Vedran Šego | ||
| Apr 7, 2014 at 19:48 | history | edited | 200_successMod | edited tags | |
| Apr 7, 2014 at 18:35 | history | edited | 200_successMod | edited tags | |
| Apr 7, 2014 at 18:30 | answer | added | PopsStaffMod | timeline score: 20 | |
| Apr 7, 2014 at 18:29 | history | edited | 200_successMod | edited tags | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 21:52 | comment | added | Vedran Šego | @200_success You're right. I didn't expect such a long list. As for the disadvantages, it is unrealistic to expect something like MathJax to not produce a performance penalty. I support your suggestion to enable it on posts, but not on the front page (even though it might produce some undesirable effects, but nothing that editing wouldn't fix). | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 21:48 | answer | added | Vedran Šego | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 21:48 | history | edited | Vedran Šego | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 3776 characters in body |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 20:06 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | For the record... disadvantages of MathJax | |
| Apr 3, 2014 at 16:56 | answer | added | 200_successMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 1, 2014 at 8:22 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | I doubt we need MathJax for question titles, though. If an option to allow MathJax only on post bodies and not question titles is available, then perhaps it might be possible to avoid loading MathJax support on the front page and other question lists. | |
| Apr 1, 2014 at 8:03 | answer | added | 200_successMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 8:28 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 12:28 | answer | added | user35796 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 2, 2014 at 17:48 | answer | added | syb0rg | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 9:54 | comment | added | 200_success | It would be a bad idea to use $ as a MathJax delimiter on a programming site. If we use \$ or $$, as in Electrical Engineering, then no existing posts would get misinterpreted. In fact, one user tried to write MathJax unsuccessfully. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 7:34 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 20, 2014 at 19:12 | history | edited | Vedran Šego | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Updated with the joint info from the answers |
| Feb 20, 2014 at 11:24 | answer | added | rolfl | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 20, 2014 at 7:15 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 22:56 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 13:27 | answer | added | Gareth Rees | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 24, 2014 at 21:23 | comment | added | Vedran Šego | @DanielCook I've used this one's "Download Image" (as PNG) and uploaded it to CR.SE. | |
| Jan 24, 2014 at 20:33 | comment | added | Daniel | This may be of interest: meta.stackexchange.com/a/4159/199647 It lists a place where you can generate images using MathML that you then hotlink... though since you can't rely on that site always hosting your image it may not be a good idea. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 18:50 | answer | added | JamalMod | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 18:04 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 13:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/425254236772139008 | ||
| Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 | comment | added | Vedran Šego | @Malachi Technically, it's not a problem to implement MathJax. It's just a bit of JavaScript code in the pages' headers. Of course, SE may have made some extra adjustments, but these can be copied from Math.SE. The problem that may be introduced is that $ is used in shell programming as well, so some extra editing may be needed in new users' posts (who don't use ticks and/or code blocks). I don't see that as a problem, but I might be wrong. | |
| Jan 20, 2014 at 2:39 | history | asked | Vedran Šego | CC BY-SA 3.0 |