Timeline for Is this edit okay?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 13:36 | history | edited | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 35 characters in body |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 11:43 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Oh I see what you mean now, right. I'll edit later, thanks! | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 11:36 | comment | added | nhgrif | Your answer isn't clear though. That's why I commented. You say "this edit removes a piece of a noise" which seems to be a good thing, then you offer an alternative edit, which ADDS code (and adding code is drastically different) and say that your example is something you would have rejected, but you don't directly comment on my edit to remove the chunk I removed. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 11:31 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Closed, yes. Unclear what's being asked, not at all. As for the edit in question, I think this answer is pretty clear,I don't think it's a very good edit, I would have rejected it. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 11:22 | comment | added | nhgrif | This doesn't answer the actual question asked all that well. I think everyone probably agrees the question belongs closed in its current state. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 1:30 | history | edited | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 18 characters in body |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 1:22 | history | answered | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |