Timeline for Revising the "insufficient explanation" post notice
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Feb 4, 2016 at 21:10 | history | edited | 200_successMod | edited tags | |
| Feb 2, 2016 at 22:15 | vote | accept | 200_success | ||
| Jan 26, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | Raystafarian | It might also be relevant to provide a link to a canon meta question describing how to write a good answer, if that's possible. Especially considering the help center is pretty standard across all sites, the answering information there is..lackluster. | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 18:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/690238241111416834 | ||
| Jan 21, 2016 at 7:51 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg Mod | FYI: I did also apply this post notice to this revision of an answer: codereview.stackexchange.com/revisions/117387/1 | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 4:04 | answer | added | 200_successMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 1:32 | answer | added | Quill | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 1:19 | answer | added | Phrancis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 1:12 | history | edited | 200_successMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 3 characters in body |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 1:10 | history | edited | JamalMod | edited tags | |
| Jan 21, 2016 at 1:09 | history | asked | 200_successMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |