Timeline for Base class for singletons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016 at 0:42 | comment | added | DevWL | + 1 for "SingletonClassVendor" | |
| Sep 29, 2016 at 0:04 | comment | added | DevWL | There is a reason why static instance holds array instead of single object. I want to provide a solution that allows to extend more then one class in a way that they do not overwrite each other. This could be important if you use them interchangeably rather that in sequence. | |
| Sep 29, 2016 at 0:02 | comment | added | DevWL | Yes Mike you are correct. This is more less what it is at the moment. Have a look at my update. The class it self is not singleton it only provides functionality of singleton for the classes that extends from it. We could call it "SingletonClassVendor" I gues. Thanks. | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 22:17 | history | answered | Mike Brant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |