Timeline for Singly-linked list implementation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/ | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 17:22 | comment | added | fer-rum | I addressed it shortly, since otherwise I would write a whole new side story. I rarely run into these cases, so you might want to proof-read. I am not sure if the OP wanted to address ODR issues - at the first glance this looked more like premature optimization to me. (Did not actually try it without the inline though.) | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 17:16 | history | edited | fer-rum | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Included kudos (now with the correct nick) |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 16:22 | comment | added | Cody Gray | inline was presumably included here to bypass the ODR, rather than as a misguided attempt to assist the compiler in optimization. Of course, it is still misguided, because the ODR does not apply to template functions that are not fully specialized. Consider updating your answer to mention this important distinction and address what is the OP's most likely misconception. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 15:49 | comment | added | fer-rum | Indeed. Maybe I should have made that more clear. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 15:45 | comment | added | Edward | Just one note about #pragma once - while it is supported by a number of popular compilers, it's not standardized and therefore not guaranteed to be portable. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 15:10 | history | answered | fer-rum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |