Timeline for WinForms dice roller
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2013 at 1:58 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Thanks! I guess if you want your buttons, labels and comboboxes to scale it works well (I found it completely broke the OP's layout here), I'm learning WPF right now and I'm [ab]using StackPanel and DockPanel a lot; I use a Grid merely to have a fixed-height section at the top and bottom of my windows... But I'm not even halfway through that brick-like book (Pro WPF) and got a lot to learn still, but I find WPF is made for resizable layouts, vs WinForms with its coordinate-based layout is more... fixed-size-friendly. :) | |
| Oct 26, 2013 at 1:47 | comment | added | Robert Snyder | AWESOME review. I take issue with saying that TableLayoutPanel is not a good idea. You mentioned WPF and Grid is essentially a TableLayoutPanel, which makes up more than 75% of my user controls in WPF. I've used TableLayoutPanel a few times in a old program I had to fix at work and it scaled my buttons, Labels, and Comboboxes nicely. The program ran on 2 tablets, one with a 9" screen, and the other with a 5" screen with very different resolutions. Just my 2 cents, but I like TableLayoutPanel for winforms, I just don't like winforms any more :) | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 15:26 | comment | added | Andy Hoffman | Thank you for the review. I'll be making some edits to the code here today and commit them. | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 2:49 | history | edited | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 | deleted 145 characters in body |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 2:42 | history | edited | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Added actual code review |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 21:06 | vote | accept | Andy Hoffman | ||
| Oct 24, 2013 at 14:46 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2013 at 19:30 | comment | added | Andy Hoffman | Thanks I'll try it out. I added some spit and polish to the program including renaming it to something more like it is github.com/andyhoffman12/ShadowRunDiceRoller | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 19:12 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Just a warning about R#: it's ADDICTIVE! :) | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 19:11 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Hmm try downloading the ReSharper demo, it's enforcing them by default. The underscore prefix differenciates private fields from parameters so you can assign _context = context in a constructor, for example. | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 18:10 | comment | added | Andy Hoffman | Also I am curious to know where you get the naming conventions at. I did a brief look on MS's site to see about that but did not see much in the way of _for private ... | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 17:20 | comment | added | Andy Hoffman | Thanks for the Advice. I'll make some changes to it which should show up in github later. | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 17:12 | history | answered | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |